skip to main | skip to sidebar

History Section 38279 1pm

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

McClellan

How come General McClellan wasn't relieved sooner than he was? He failed to act on numerous occasions when he should of attacked the Rebels. Also many believed him to be a Confederate sympathizer. Why wasn't he replaced sooner?
Posted by JoelBalsbaugh at 12:21 PM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Contributors

  • Adam Dietrich
  • Derek Hannawald
  • JoelBalsbaugh
  • Jon S
  • Kelsey Frailey
  • Rafe Elenburg
  • Sean Moorman
  • Shaun Brammer
  • Sir CrankyPants
  • jeff lopez
  • justin griest
  • megmcc

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2007 (53)
    • ►  12/02 - 12/09 (1)
    • ►  11/25 - 12/02 (6)
    • ►  11/11 - 11/18 (1)
    • ►  11/04 - 11/11 (7)
    • ►  10/28 - 11/04 (4)
    • ►  10/21 - 10/28 (5)
    • ►  10/14 - 10/21 (6)
    • ▼  09/30 - 10/07 (6)
      • The Army's Equipment
      • McClellan
      • Habeas Corpus
      • Habeous Corpus
      • jack-o-lantern
      • Oct 1-4: Watkins, Lincoln, Battle
    • ►  09/23 - 09/30 (5)
    • ►  09/16 - 09/23 (4)
    • ►  09/09 - 09/16 (5)
    • ►  09/02 - 09/09 (1)
    • ►  08/26 - 09/02 (1)
    • ►  08/19 - 08/26 (1)