Week 3

I was just wondering about inner family problems when it came to slavery in the south. For example, if the son of a slaveowner was absolutely against slavery do you think that they fought against each other in the Civil War. I have heard about movies where this problem has come up but I wasn't sure if it really happened in the 1860's.

9/12/07

Professor Weber is arguing that the institution of slavery caused the Civil War. In one of our previous discussions someone mentioned states' rights as being the cause of the Civil War. Aren't those two really the same thing? I mean, the ability to have slavery was a right that the Southern states wanted to keep.

week 3

During all this chaos in the south I wonder if any slave owner sat down and thought maybe it would be a good idea to give up their slaves and join the north just because he didn't want an uprise of slaves to harm him or his family.

Post for Week Three

The argument about counterrevolution is very interesting. The idea that during the Revolution they were preserving their rights as apposed to the South at this time overthrowing order. There is a very distinct difference and an unfair anology to use in order to justify the South's Succession

Sept 10 -14: John Brown & Secession

Please create your own post if you can. If you still can't then you can comment on this post (use your comment as a post) or comment on one of this week's other posts.

Thank you to all of you who have signed on and participated. If you haven't signed on and participated yet, remember that it is your responsibility to do so.